Over 1000 Clients Represented
You need an experienced attorney. John has tried more than a dozen cases to jury verdict as lead defense attorney. He knows what a good resolution of your case is, and more importantly what a bad resolution is.
“Mr. Crangle did a great job in handling my legal issue. Quick, polite, easy to work with, and affordable. Definitely would recommend!”
Vincent D“100% recommend John for any ongoing case. He got my case dismissed. Best criminal defense in the upstate.”
Johnathan MWhat Is Revenge Porn in South Carolina?
South Carolina Code § 16-15-332 makes it illegal to share intimate images without consent. The law prohibits anyone from intentionally disseminating an intimate or digitally forged image of someone else without consent.
Key definitions in this statute include:
Intimate image: This refers to any image or video that depicts a person’s bare genitals, pubic area, anus, or the nipple or areola of a post-pubescent female. It also includes images showing bodily fluids in a sexual context, sexual activity, or sexually explicit nudity.
Digitally forged intimate image: Images created or altered using AI or other technologies that falsely depict a real person in a sexual or intimate manner. This includes deepfakes and manipulated photos.
Effective consent: This means the person gave knowing, voluntary permission. Consent to create an image doesn’t mean permission to share it widely. It must be clear that just because a person shared an image with someone, they did not authorize it to be shared further.
Identifiable individual: This is a person identifiable through the image or additional information related to it.
This law is comprehensive. It covers sharing images through any medium, such as social media posts, texts, emails, messaging apps, adult websites, and direct sharing with third parties. Multiple images shared in one act are treated as a single offense under the statute. Violations may also involve privacy laws, adding complexity to each case.
Penalties for Revenge Porn in Greenville, SC
South Carolina’s new revenge porn law introduces penalties based on the intent behind the conduct.
With intent to cause harm or financial gain: – First offense: Felony, up to a $5,000 fine and/or up to five years in prison – Second or subsequent offense: Felony, up to a $10,000 fine and/or one to ten years in prison
Without harm or financial intent: – First offense: Misdemeanor, up to a $5,000 fine and/or up to one year in jail – Second or subsequent offense: Felony, up to a $5,000 fine and/or up to five years in prison
The law also prohibits the use of intimate images in responses for criminal discovery and motions, offering victims additional protection during prosecution.
These charges can lead to further investigations into related acts. A conviction could prompt probes into cyberstalking, computer fraud, or sex crimes depending on the images and conduct involved. Legal counsel can help navigate these complex layers of potential liabilities.
How Revenge Porn Cases Are Prosecuted in Greenville County
Since the statute only became effective in May 2025, prosecution in Greenville County is evolving. The 13th Judicial Circuit Solicitor’s Office handles felony cases in General Sessions Court, while magistrate courts address misdemeanors.
Investigations commonly start with a victim’s complaint. Victims indicate how and where images were shared, and investigators may subpoena social media, messaging apps, and web hosts for records. Digital forensics may be used to recover deleted images, access communications, and determine who shared the images and when. Cooperation with forensic professionals is often crucial for both prosecution and defense.
Proving intent is crucial to determine the level of charges. Prosecutors check messages, emails, and communications around the image distribution to see if the defendant intended to harm the victim. Clear evidence, such as direct statements or distribution timing, influences how aggressively prosecutors pursue felony charges.
Due to the statute’s newness, its enforcement will face several challenges. Questions about “effective consent,” proving intent for altered images, and the law’s application to older shared images will be litigated as the law matures.
South Carolina is also part of a broader cyber crimes framework. When the distribution involves hacking to acquire images, the act may also breach the Computer Crime Act, leading to computer fraud charges.
Defense Strategies for Revenge Porn
Effective consent: The prosecution must show images were shared without effective consent. If the depicted person authorized broader distribution or shared images willingly, giving the defendant reason to believe further sharing was allowed, this forms a defense. Consent doesn’t need to be in writing, but the circumstances under which images were shared matter.
Identity of the depicted person: The person in the images must be identifiable. If images don’t allow for identification through the image or accompanying info, this part of the charge may not be satisfied.
Attribution and authorship: If several individuals had access to the account or device from which images were shared, it requires more than just proving the images appeared. Prosecutors must prove exactly who shared the images.
Lack of intent: To apply higher-tier felony penalties, the prosecution must establish intent to cause harm or financial motive. If the act was careless or uninformed, rather than malicious, evidence may limit charges to the misdemeanor level.
Constitutional challenges: As the statute is new, various factual scenarios will lead to constitutional challenges. Issues like overreaching application, prior restraint, and digitally manipulated images raise First Amendment concerns.
Suppression of evidence: Warrants for searches of devices and accounts must comply with the Fourth Amendment. Overbroad warrants or those lacking proper cause could lead to the exclusion of critical digital evidence.
Cases under this statute often intersect with white collar crimes if images are shared for financial gain on subscription platforms. If multiple charges arise from related conduct, a unified defense strategy is crucial. Engaging a lawyer with experience in both criminal and digital law is vital for a comprehensive defense.
After resolving your case, the possibility of expungement depends on the specific charges, whether misdemeanor or felony, and your prior record. Your attorney should address this.
Why You Need a Revenge Porn Lawyer in Greenville
This evolving area of South Carolina criminal law will heavily influence how cases are prosecuted and defended. Having a defense lawyer who is knowledgeable about how this law is being interpreted in Greenville County courts is critical.
The consequences are significant. A felony conviction for nonconsensual image disclosure could mean years in prison, a lasting felony record, and potential for additional charges. The stigma from such charges could impact your professional and personal life regardless of the case outcome.
Aside from the criminal charges, a civil lawsuit for damages is possible. South Carolina courts can grant damages in civil cases, and a criminal conviction could greatly bolster a victim’s case in civil court. Legal representation can be pivotal in navigating these parallel legal challenges effectively.
John Crangle, a Greenville criminal defense lawyer, defends clients against cyber crime charges, including those under the new revenge porn law. He analyzes digital evidence, challenges prosecution at all stages, and defends your rights and future throughout the process.
Contact John Crangle today for a free consultation regarding your revenge porn or nonconsensual intimate image charge in Greenville, SC.