John Crangle is a criminal defense lawyer serving clients throughout the 13th Judicial Circuit. He handles cases involving violent offenses, including unlawful restraint and related kidnapping charges. Understanding the charge and crafting a strategic defense is crucial, especially given the potential severity of the penalties involved.
Over 1000 Clients Represented
You need an experienced attorney. John has tried more than a dozen cases to jury verdict as lead defense attorney. He knows what a good resolution of your case is, and more importantly what a bad resolution is.
“Mr. Crangle did a great job in handling my legal issue. Quick, polite, easy to work with, and affordable. Definitely would recommend!”
Vincent D“100% recommend John for any ongoing case. He got my case dismissed. Best criminal defense in the upstate.”
Johnathan MWhat Is Unlawful Restraint in South Carolina?
Unlawful restraint in South Carolina is outlined in S.C. Code § 16-3-915. This statute makes it illegal for a person to knowingly restrain another without consent, interfere with their liberty, and expose them to a substantial risk of serious physical injury. The State must prove:
You knowingly restrained another person
Without their consent
The restraint significantly interfered with their liberty and exposed them to a substantial risk of serious physical injury
This charge differs from false imprisonment, a lesser misdemeanor under S.C. Code § 16-3-916. While both involve restraint without consent, unlawful restraint adds the element of significant risk of physical injury, elevating it to a felony. The distinction between these charges can be a critical aspect of your defense strategy.
Unlawful restraint is a lesser-included offense of kidnapping under S.C. Code § 16-3-910. This distinction is vital for defense: an attorney might argue that while some level of unlawful restraint occurred, it does not reach the severity of kidnapping. Presenting both charges to a jury may lead to a conviction on the lesser charge, avoiding harsher kidnapping penalties. Understanding these nuances is essential for constructing a defense that minimizes potential penalties.
These charges can arise in various situations, such as physical altercations, domestic disputes where one party is prevented from leaving, or when someone is trapped in a vehicle or room. The unifying factor is that the person’s freedom of movement is significantly restricted without their agreement, and there is a genuine risk of serious harm involved. Awareness of these circumstances can help in identifying potential defenses and strategies.
The substantial risk element typically necessitates some degree of physical danger, distinguishing it from misdemeanor false imprisonment. This factor escalates the situation from a misdemeanor to a felony. Arguing against the presence of this risk can be an effective defense strategy.
Penalties for Unlawful Restraint in Greenville, SC
A conviction for unlawful restraint under S.C. Code § 16-3-915 can result in a fine of up to $5,000 and imprisonment for up to 20 years. This is a life-altering sentence. Even without the maximum penalty, a felony conviction leads to:
Permanent loss of gun ownership rights under state and federal law
Loss of voting rights during incarceration
Significant challenges in finding employment, especially in licensed professions
Difficulty obtaining housing or loans
Immigration issues for non-citizens
A permanent criminal record that hinders you wherever you live
False imprisonment, by contrast, carries only a fine of up to $1,000 and a maximum of three years in prison. In cases where both charges are plausible, distinguishing between them is crucial. The differences in penalties highlight the importance of a well-constructed defense strategy.
Sentences for unlawful restraint can accumulate if other violent offenses are involved. If you are also charged with Assault and Battery 1st Degree or similar offenses related to the same event, the judge could impose consecutive sentences. Understanding how these charges interact can be key in negotiating a more favorable sentence.
Prosecution of Unlawful Restraint Cases in Greenville County
The 13th Judicial Circuit Solicitor’s Office prosecutes felony unlawful restraint cases in the Court of General Sessions. The case typically relies on the alleged victim’s account, backed by physical evidence, 911 calls, officer body camera footage, witness testimony, and communications between parties. Knowing how the prosecution builds its case allows a defense attorney to effectively challenge weak points.
Since unlawful restraint involves both the restraint element and the significant risk of injury, prosecutors must establish more than just the absence of consent. They need to demonstrate a genuine threat of serious harm. Medical records, photographic evidence, and professional testimony can help establish this element. A defense lawyer can counter these claims by questioning the validity and relevance of the evidence presented.
Unlawful restraint is often charged alongside other violent offenses. If the incident involves household members, a CDV charge may accompany an unlawful restraint charge. A Violent Crimes Lawyer familiar with the 13th Judicial Circuit can identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and offer strategic defenses.
For domestic cases, prosecutors follow a “no-drop” policy on domestic violence-related charges. Even if the alleged victim recants or is uncooperative, the Solicitor’s Office may proceed using other evidence. This policy underscores the importance of having a knowledgeable attorney who can navigate these complexities.
Defense Strategies for Unlawful Restraint
Contesting Consent: The State must prove the restraint was without consent. If evidence shows the alleged victim agreed to the situation, or had the option to leave and did not, consent can be argued. This can be a pivotal point in challenging the prosecution’s case.
Refuting “Substantial Risk of Serious Physical Injury”: The risk element sets apart felony unlawful restraint from misdemeanor false imprisonment. If the State cannot prove exposure to genuine significant harm, the felony charge fails. This argument is particularly strong when no physical violence or threats were present. Demonstrating the absence of risk can significantly alter the case’s trajectory.
Pushing for Lesser Charges: Unlawful restraint is a lesser-included offense of kidnapping, as is false imprisonment of unlawful restraint. If evidence shows restraint but no significant risk of injury, the defense can aim for a false imprisonment conviction instead. Achieving a reduction in charges can drastically lessen potential penalties.
Self-Defense or Defense of Others: Restraining someone to prevent harm to yourself or others may be a legal defense. Presenting a credible self-defense claim can lead to dismissal or acquittal.
Questioning Witness Credibility: For cases relying solely on the alleged victim’s testimony, the witness’s credibility, consistency, and motives must be thoroughly examined. Effective cross-examination can undermine the prosecution’s case.
Evidence Suppression: If evidence or statements were obtained unconstitutionally, a suppression motion can exclude it from trial. Ensuring that only admissible evidence is presented is crucial in shaping the case’s outcome.
Presenting an Alibi: If the incident did not occur as alleged, alibi witnesses, surveillance footage, phone records, and more can challenge the State’s narrative. Providing a solid alibi can lead to a favorable verdict.
Charges like ABHAN (Assault & Battery High and Aggravated Nature) and Assault and Battery 2nd Degree that often accompany unlawful restraint require a coordinated defense. John Crangle evaluates all charges collectively, ensuring a comprehensive defense strategy.
Why You Need an Unlawful Restraint Lawyer in Greenville
A conviction for unlawful restraint can lead to up to 20 years in prison, while false imprisonment carries a maximum of only three years. The critical factor that differentiates these outcomes is whether the restraint exposed the person to a significant risk of serious physical injury. Contesting this element or arguing that the facts support only the lesser charge requires an attorney skilled in statute interpretation and familiar with Greenville County courts.
Those charged with unlawful restraint may also face CDV, assault, or other allegations from the same event. An encompassing defense that considers every charge is essential. John Crangle develops strategies that address the complete picture, not just the gravest charge on paper. His understanding of local court practices and procedures can be instrumental in achieving a favorable result.
If the incident involved a weapon, Weapons Charges Lawyer representation may be crucial alongside the unlawful restraint defense. When charges arise from a situation involving a household member, understanding CDV statutes and their connection to unlawful restraint is vital. A comprehensive defense approach ensures that all aspects of the case are addressed effectively.
Contact John Crangle for a confidential consultation. A 20-year felony requires a serious defense approach, and having a knowledgeable attorney on your side can make all the difference.